Syllabus

Wednesday, April 12, 2017

objective of discussion section

3 required things
  1. a clear, reasoned connection of your result with the other 10, that is, if you don't agree, and especially if you do agree
  2. your result is consistent with field of PH, plus a sense of the field in the converstaional sense (they say, ... this review says, ... these other scholars say... ) some sort of sense of how it all fits together and where you fit into that
  3. insertion of counterargument or meta-awareness of your reasoning's own limits

length
  • extra language + exhaust reasoning = approx. 1-1.25 pages

No comments:

Post a Comment