Perfect example paragraph p. 152

ch6 p2

ch 6 p1

Theme can be directly relevant but of weak evidence

Different aspects

Do not fit

Rationale for subsections

You should be trying to tell a story

Be sure and demonstrate how the themes, ie, your interpretation of others' results, directly answer you rq, or that you set out to explain why they can't

You can be creative in your thematic naming, but you have to justify the name

Again, including the limitations of your own research effort is a strength

When identifying themes, you need to consider context/setting when determining relevance of misfit/significant differences--eg, childbirth, inner city area, etc.

You need to include your own limits of comprehension in your results section

Do not attempt to make your finding seem more coherent, that is, the thematic analysis compiled with the critical appraisal that you use to draw your overall conclusion

You will need to become aware of why some papers are stronger than others and to wrote this up in the method sections probably

Themes = INTERPRETATION of results

Critical appraisal, first, identity themes, second

critical summary table

Critical appraisal = strengths and weaknesses + detailed summary

Lessens the impact of one, makes all more meaningful