kristy b's

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9HY3HwE4sQ

link

sean t's

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCDfs9fS2Ak&feature=youtu.be

link

jordan's pres

jordan's pres

key terms
counterargument
controversy/debate
font big enough and not too much
timing
projecting voice
important doesn't equal the mere recognition that something is important, but showing how that something played an important role in instantiating your purpose and in the context of your paper with examples and quotes and a reading of those quotes with highlights and pointers and emphases and so on

sean's pres

sean's pres

5-8

click here for the final pres sign in sheet

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ovk_p4yEL6tjSrETwrbp3Kr77CWoIPYHRN0HOwnYV1I/edit

Allie Baracani	May 8	10:10
2. Julia Miravalle	May 8	10:15
3. Karina Castro	May 8	10:20
4. Sean Texter	May 8	10:25
5. Jordan Price 6. Ricardo Ugarte	May 8	10:30 10:35
7. Gurleen Mangat 8. Monae Freeman	May 8	10:40 10:45

sensitivity to context

how would the actual being in new york affect the presentation of information versus being somewhere else? what changes as a result of you having to present there?

5-3: best explanation of re-purposing or final presentation yet

as you can see in this whiteboard, the key is different senses of place and purpose. for instance, a good presentation would give me a good sense of

• why and how you made major decisions about what to include and exclude when you were working with the academic journals and purposing them for the genre of the literature review. that is, i'd want to know how and why you lifted certain quotes rather than others and why you talked about those quotes in the way you did, what you decided to emphasize and why, what you considered more important for your purposes and why, plus how those decisions about what was important or worth emphasizing might reflect back on the genre of the literature review or your sense of what's important to public health academically
• then, it's the same thing, but a re-purposing into another format or genre, and to a different audience, with a different purpose in mind. so i'd want to know, were you, say, talking to a school's guidance counselor or at a rehab facility, what parts of your literature review because irrelevant and why; what you would choose to highlight in that counselor's office that you would not highlight at an academic conference and why; what different quotes you would pick for him how you would read them differently and why. specifically in terms of that last example, too, i'd want to know
• why you chose that genre or format to re-purpose the literature review to (say, a brochure), what other options you felt like you had to select from and why, plus how you would both sell that information as conveyed in the brochure to the counselor, and how you would instruct her to use it, or how you'd want it to be used by that population and why, plus what intended effect you'd imagine those design decisions to have, how you'd know if those effects were taking place, and why you feel like the document as you designed it is going to be useful for the population its aimed for, and maybe even how significantly the knowledge changed from its original context in the journal article to its use down on the ground by middle schoolers

another sequence

1. basic overview of your topic, why you chose it, why it's important, why you chose that one rather than another
2. condensing from the journals 
3. condensing in revision
4. what my site looks like (site = counselor ; 
5. format + format decisions 
6. how you want the kids to use it
7. re-purposing for the public 
8. ???

be sure you sign up for a final presentation

http://publichealthpanicattackz.blogspot.com/2017/04/sign-in-sheet.html

another sequence

1. brief overview of topic in general. maybe why you chose it or why you were interested in in
2. 3 most important things about my project in an academic context <--research articles to lit review
3. <--research articles to lit review (problems with moving info from the research article to the lit review) good sense what happened when you tried to move info out of the the research article and into the genre of the lit review
4. <--research articles to lit review
5. professional site, public what that audience is composed of their needs expectations
6. document how i would design it the major decisions i'd make things i;d need and how that a=document would be purposed to meet that audience's expectations 
7.  problems with the translation
8.  problems x2 with the translation

whenever you run into a major problem just start to talk about difficult decisions you had to make in the writing process  

sequence

1. description of organization, who they are, what the audience's needs are, beliefs values, age, why your research is important at this site and now + berridge 2016?
2. 3 most imporatnt moments of your paper and why
3. quote from the primary research, the most important source i had
4. discuss how i used that quote academically; this is how the quote manifested itself in the context of my lit review
5. how would i have to talk about this differently in this diff context
6. include/exclude
7. x
8. x

for karina

1.  brief synopsis of my research in general
2. these are the 3 most important things for academics you'd need to know in an academic way 
3. 3 most important things for the public
4. description of a couple organization, who they are, what the audience's needs are, beliefs values, age, why your research is important at this site and now + berridge 2016? + potential audiences + what their needs are
5. these are the 5 most important things you need to know about my organization  + or you could talk about 5 potential challenges to any repurposing of academic to public
6. 3 most imporatnt moments of your paper and why
7. quote from the primary research, the most important source i had
8. discuss how i used that quote academically; this is how the quote manifested itself in the context of my lit review
9. how would i have to talk about this differently in this diff context
10. include/exclude
11. x

sign in sheet

here

final project, re-purposing

• public translation ; academic audience ; re-purpose ; e.g., executive summary 
• talk about your project 
• what major decisions you'd be making and why
• how'd you'd  
• different audience 
• audience's needs + expectations  <--
• document itself 
• sell it this way, for these reasons, and to this effect

objective = for you to rethink your entire project on the basis of a public and not an academic audience. your LR is for an academic audience. what audience would your research be most relevant to and why? what genre would you sell it to them and why? what would that pitch look like and why? on what basis would you try to persuade them and of what? and why? how would your imagined document's design be designed to have an effect, what effect, and why? what design decisions would you make, and how are those decisions synced up to your audience's needs and expectations?