Like I said, I chose this version to obviate the quandary as to whether to number the whole thing. Now you know. You have to number the whole thing. And the results section will be converted into a series of thematically grouped numbers:
Tuesday, February 28, 2017
new, authoritative model for the results section
Click here for the model to follow. I'll discuss this one briefly in class on 3/1. While both in APA, I think this version is a little more intuitive to follow as a model because of the numbering. I'm not saying the one discussed on 2/27 is better or worse. It's just that the other one, this one, follows a consistent numbering patterning--in other words, the introduction = 1, the methods will then be 1.1, while the results section will start on 2. And then you can do each of your theme groups 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and so on. The discussion section will be 3, the conclusion 4, and then "references." Remember, "work cited" is MLA. In APA, it's "references."
Like I said, I chose this version to obviate the quandary as to whether to number the whole thing. Now you know. You have to number the whole thing. And the results section will be converted into a series of thematically grouped numbers:
Like I said, I chose this version to obviate the quandary as to whether to number the whole thing. Now you know. You have to number the whole thing. And the results section will be converted into a series of thematically grouped numbers:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment