Ch1 questions

[ ]Systematic [ ]Remit [ ]Systematic approach (description of how the literature was searched, and how the quality of the literacy was evaluated): it has to be "clearly evident" the results arise directly from the methods [ ]Literature review as a method [ ]Good quality lit rev: what is the difference between a gq lit rev and a systematic review? "Clarity as to how the question was answered" [ ]What are the elements of a lit rev? [ ]What is the point of doing a little rev? To influence practice with best practice. [ ]Evidence-based p [ ]Quality/validity [ ]What are inclusion/exclusion criteria? And how do they work? [ ]What sense can you get of the narrative of a lit review? What comes before what and why? [ ]How does critique/appraisal work? [ ]What is the danger of not undertaking a systematic approach? Bias. [ ]What section of the lit rev does the systematic approach most closely correspond to? [ ]What is cherry picking, and how does it work? [ ]What is the significance of the puzzle/jigsaw metaphor? And what does it relate to personal expertise? [ ]What is the function of a RQ? [ ]Know to unknown: what is the direction of the research? To deductively capture the unknown Gut feeling...past alone<--meta-g